GRE Physics Companion: Differential Cross Sections and Rutherford Scattering
For axially symmetric classical scattering,
For repulsive Coulomb scattering,
so
1 High-value GRE facts
- Rutherford scattering uses the relative or center of mass kinetic energy.
- b = (k∕2E) cot(χ∕2) for repulsive Coulomb scattering.
- dσ∕dΩ ∝ E−2 at fixed angle.
- dσ∕dΩ ∝ csc 4(χ∕2).
- Large-angle scattering corresponds to small impact parameter.
- The head-on closest approach is rmin = k∕E.
- The Coulomb scattering length is a = k∕(2E).
- The integrated cross section above χ0 is πa2 cot 2(χ
0∕2).
- The ideal unscreened Coulomb total cross section diverges at zero angle.
- For a very heavy target, center of mass energy and angle approach their projectile
laboratory counterparts.
Part I: Original GRE-style problems
Problem 1: energy scaling
At fixed scattering angle, the projectile energy is doubled. The Rutherford differential cross section
changes by a factor of
- 1∕4
- 1∕2
- 1
- 2
- 4
Problem 2: charge scaling
At fixed E and χ, one charge magnitude is doubled. The Rutherford differential cross section
changes by a factor of
- 1∕4
- 1∕2
- 1
- 2
- 4
Problem 3: impact parameter at 90∘
Define a = k∕(2E). For χ = 90∘, the Rutherford impact parameter is
- 0
- a∕2
- a
- 2a
- infinity
Problem 4: head-on closest approach
For repulsive Coulomb scattering, the head-on closest approach is
- a∕2
- a
- 2a
- 4a
- zero
Problem 5: small-angle behavior
For small χ, Rutherford scattering behaves approximately as
- χ−1
- χ−2
- χ−3
- χ−4
- e−χ
Problem 6: differential cross-section units
The customary units of dσ∕dΩ are
- m
- m∕s
- m2
- m2∕sr
- sr∕m2
Problem 7: barn conversion
One barn equals
- 10−15 m2
- 10−20 m2
- 10−24 m2
- 10−28 m2
- 10−32 m2
Problem 8: integrated angular cut
The cross section for Rutherford scattering through angles at least χ0 is
- πa2 cot 2(χ
0∕2)
- πa2 tan 2(χ
0∕2)
- 4πa2
- πa2 sin 2χ
0
- a2∕χ
0
Problem 9: small angle and impact parameter
For repulsive Rutherford scattering, as b increases,
- χ increases
- χ decreases
- χ remains fixed
- E must vanish
- the reduced mass becomes zero
Problem 10: center of mass energy
A projectile of mass m1 with lab kinetic energy Elab strikes a stationary target of mass m2. The
relative kinetic energy is
- Elab
Elab
Elab
Elab
- zero
Problem 11: pure Coulomb total cross section
If arbitrarily small nonzero scattering angles are counted for an unscreened Coulomb potential, the
classical total cross section is
- zero
- πa2
- finite and independent of energy
- divergent
- equal to one barn
Problem 12: heavy target limit
If m2 ≫ m1, then for a stationary target
- ECM ≪ Elab and angles are unrelated
- ECM ≈ Elab and 𝜃lab ≈ χ
- ECM = 0
- 𝜃lab = 0 for all events
- the reduced mass approaches m2
Part II: Complete worked solutions
Solution 1
At fixed angle,
Therefore
Answer: (A).
Solution 2
Since
and
doubling one charge multiplies the cross section by four. Answer: (E).
Solution 3
Answer: (C).
Solution 4
For a head-on encounter,
Answer: (C).
Solution 5
For small angle,
Therefore
Answer: (D).
Solution 6
A differential cross section is an area per unit solid angle:
Answer: (D).
Solution 7
By definition,
Answer: (D).
Solution 8
All events with χ ≥ χ0 correspond to
Thus
Answer: (A).
Solution 9
From
larger b corresponds to smaller χ. Answer: (B).
Solution 10
Since
and
Answer: (C).
Solution 11
As
Hence the ideal unscreened Coulomb integrated cross section diverges. Answer: (D).
Solution 12
When
the reduced mass approaches m1, the center of mass energy approaches projectile lab energy, and
the lab projectile angle approaches the center of mass angle. Answer: (B).
2 GRE checklist
- Use center of mass relative energy in the exact Rutherford formula.
- Keep the half-angle: cot(χ∕2) and csc 4(χ∕2).
- Remember the E−2 scaling.
- Large angle means small impact parameter.
- Distinguish a = k∕(2E) from rmin = k∕E for head-on scattering.
- Use the barn conversion 1 barn = 10−28 m2.
- A zero-angle cutoff is essential for a finite integrated pure-Coulomb cross section.
- Check whether a laboratory-to-center of mass angle transformation is needed.
References
References
[1] E. Rutherford, “The Scattering of α and β Particles by Matter and the Structure of
the Atom,” Philosophical Magazine, Series 6, Vol. 21, 1911.
[2] J. R. Taylor, Classical Mechanics, University Science Books, 2005.
[3] H. Goldstein, C. Poole, and J. Safko, Classical Mechanics, 3rd ed., Addison-Wesley,
2002.