Electromagnetic Waves, Antennas, and RF: Transmission Lines - Exercises and Complete Worked
Solutions
EM22 derived the telegrapher’s equations and showed how the distributed parameters R, L, G,
and C produce a propagation constant, a characteristic impedance, forward and reflected waves,
Standing Waves, and impedance transformation. This companion article turns those derivations
into a sequence of worked calculations.
The central relations are
and, for a lossless line of length ℓ,
These formulas are consequences of distributed electromagnetic wave propagation, not independent
circuit rules [1, 2, 3, 4].
Figure. The calculation chain used throughout this problem set: physical line parameters
lead to R,L,G,C, then to γ and Z0, and finally to reflection, standing waves, and
transformed impedance.
Part I: Exercises
Exercise 1: recover the per-unit-length RLCG parameters
A 2.00 m section of uniform transmission line has total series resistance 0.400 Ω, total
series inductance 0.500 μH, total shunt conductance 4.00 μS, and total shunt capacitance
200 pF.
Find R, L, G, and C per unit length. State the SI units of each quantity and identify which
parameters represent stored field energy and which represent dissipation.
Exercise 2: exact propagation constant and characteristic impedance
At f = 100 MHz, a uniform line has
Using the exact formulas, calculate
- the propagation constant γ = α + iβ;
- the characteristic impedance Z0 in rectangular and polar form;
- the wavelength λ = 2π∕β;
- the phase velocity vp = ω∕β.
Exercise 3: test the low-loss approximation
For the line in Exercise 2:
- evaluate R∕(ωL) and G∕(ωC);
- use the low-loss approximations
with Z0 ≈
;
- compare with the exact result;
- find the voltage-amplitude ratio and power ratio after 100 m, and express the loss in
dB.
Exercise 4: an ideal lossless line
A lossless line has
Find
- Z0;
- vp;
- the wavelength at 500 MHz;
- the phase constant β at that frequency.
Exercise 5: complex load reflection coefficient
A lossless 50 Ω line is terminated by
Calculate the load reflection coefficient ΓL in rectangular and polar form. Interpret the magnitude
and phase physically.
Exercise 6: reflected power, return loss, and SWR
Continue Exercise 5. Find
- the reflected power fraction;
- the fraction of incident power delivered to the load;
- the SWR;
- the return loss
If the forward voltage-wave phasor amplitude is |V +| = 10 V, calculate the forward, reflected, and
net average powers.
Figure. The complex reflection coefficient contains two different pieces of information: |Γ|
controls reflected-wave magnitude and SWR, while arg Γ controls where the standing-wave
pattern sits relative to the load.
Exercise 7: standing-wave maxima and minima
A lossless line has wavelength
and load reflection coefficient
Let d ≥ 0 denote distance measured from the load back toward the generator. If |V +| = 4.00 V,
determine
- |V |max and |V |min;
- the nearest voltage maximum to the load;
- the nearest voltage minimum to the load;
- the separation between adjacent maxima.
Exercise 8: infer mismatch magnitude and phase from an SWR measurement
A lossless line has wavelength 24.0 cm. A slotted-line measurement gives
and the nearest voltage maximum is 3.00 cm from the load toward the generator.
Determine |ΓL| and one equivalent value of arg ΓL in the interval (−180∘, 180∘].
Figure. For a lossless line, the phase of ΓL shifts the standing-wave pattern. Magnitude
controls the envelope contrast; phase controls the positions of maxima and minima.
Exercise 9: input impedance of a finite lossless line
A 50 Ω lossless line is terminated in
The line length is
Find the input impedance Zin.
Exercise 10: quarter-wave impedance transformer
A 50 Ω feed line must be matched to a purely resistive 100 Ω load at one design frequency using a
lossless quarter-wave transformer.
Find the required characteristic impedance Zt of the transformer section and verify algebraically
that the input impedance looking into the quarter-wave section is 50 Ω.
Exercise 11: short-circuited line
A lossless 50 Ω line is terminated in a short circuit. Derive
Then evaluate the input impedance for
- ℓ = λ∕8;
- ℓ = λ∕4;
- ℓ = λ∕2.
Interpret each result.
Exercise 12: open-circuited line
A lossless 50 Ω line is terminated in an open circuit. Derive
Evaluate the same three lengths λ∕8, λ∕4, and λ∕2. Compare the results with the short-circuit
case.
Exercise 13: the quarter-wave impedance inverter
Starting from the lossless input-impedance formula, prove that a quarter-wave section
obeys
Use this to explain why a quarter-wave line transforms an open circuit into a short circuit and a
short circuit into an open circuit.
Exercise 14: coaxial-line geometry to C, L, Z0, and velocity
A lossless coaxial cable has inner-conductor radius
outer-conductor inner radius
and a homogeneous dielectric with
Use
to calculate C, L, Z0, and vp. Verify explicitly that LC = μ𝜖.
Figure. Coaxial geometry converts the full transverse electromagnetic field problem into
per-unit-length L and C. Their product fixes wave speed; their ratio fixes characteristic
impedance.
Exercise 15: design the coax radius ratio for 50 Ω
For a lossless nonmagnetic coax filled with 𝜖r = 2.25, choose the radius ratio b∕a required
for
Use
If a = 0.500 mm, determine b.
Exercise 16: Julia sweep of load impedance and line length
Write a Julia program for a lossless 50 Ω line that:
- sweeps a purely resistive load from 10 Ω to 200 Ω and computes ΓL, reflected power
fraction, and SWR;
- for the fixed load ZL = 30 + i40 Ω, sweeps ℓ∕λ from 0 to 0.5 and computes Zin;
- verifies numerically that Zin = ZL again at ℓ = λ∕2;
- verifies the quarter-wave inversion at ℓ = λ∕4.
Part II: Complete Worked Solutions
Solution 1: recover the per-unit-length RLCG parameters
For a uniform line, each distributed parameter equals the total value divided by the physical
length.
For resistance,
| R | =  | (26)
|
| = 0.200 Ω∕m . | (27) |
For inductance,
| L | =  | (28)
|
| = 250 nH/m . | (29) |
For conductance,
| G | =  | (30)
|
| = 2.00 μS/m . | (31) |
For capacitance,
| C | =  | (32)
|
| = 100 pF/m . | (33) |
The parameters L and C represent magnetic and electric field-energy storage. The parameters R
and G represent Conductor and dielectric dissipation. The dimensions are therefore
Solution 2: exact propagation constant and characteristic impedance
The angular frequency is
The series impedance per unit length is
| R + iωL | = 0.080 + i(6.28319 × 108)(250 × 10−9) | (36)
|
| = 0.080 + i157.080 Ω∕m. | (37) |
The shunt admittance per unit length is
| G + iωC | = 2.00 × 10−6 + i(6.28319 × 108)(100 × 10−12) | (38)
|
| = 2.00 × 10−6 + i0.0628319 S/m. | (39) |
Therefore
Evaluating the complex square root gives
Thus
The characteristic impedance is
which gives
Its polar form is
The wavelength is
| λ | =  | (46)
|
| ≈ | (47)
|
| = 2.000 m . | (48) |
Finally,
| vp | =  | (49)
|
| ≈ | (50)
|
| = 2.00 × 108 m/s . | (51) |
The line is very nearly lossless in phase and impedance, but the exact solution retains a small
attenuation and a tiny impedance phase angle.
Solution 3: test the low-loss approximation
First,
 | =  | (52)
|
| = 5.09 × 10−4, | (53) |
and
 | =  | (54)
|
| = 3.18 × 10−5. | (55) |
Both ratios are much less than one, so the low-loss approximation is strongly justified.
The lossless characteristic impedance is
| Z0 | ≈ | (56)
|
| =  | (57)
|
| = 50.0 Ω. | (58) |
Then
| α | ≈ +  | (59)
|
| = +  | (60)
|
| = 8.00 × 10−4 + 5.00 × 10−5 | (61)
|
| = 8.50 × 10−4 Np/m . | (62) |
Also,
| β | ≈ ω | (63)
|
| = (6.28319 × 108) | (64)
|
| = 3.14159 rad/m . | (65) |
These agree with the exact result to the displayed precision.
After z = 100 m, a forward voltage amplitude is multiplied by
| e−αz | = e−(8.50×10−4)(100) | (66)
|
| = 0.9185 . | (67) |
Power is quadratic in amplitude, so
The power loss in decibels is
| 10 log 10(0.8437) | = −0.738 dB . | (69) |
Equivalently, the positive insertion loss magnitude is 0.738 dB.
Solution 4: an ideal lossless line
For a lossless line,
Therefore
| Z0 | =  | (71)
|
| = 63.25 Ω . | (72) |
The propagation speed is
| vp | =  | (73)
|
| =  | (74)
|
| = 1.581 × 108 m/s . | (75) |
At f = 500 MHz,
| λ | =  | (76)
|
| =  | (77)
|
| = 0.3162 m . | (78) |
Then
| β | =  | (79)
|
| = 19.87 rad/m . | (80) |
Solution 5: complex load reflection coefficient
Use
Substituting ZL = 30 + i40 Ω and Z0 = 50 Ω,
| ΓL | = . | (82) |
Multiply numerator and denominator by 80 − i40:
| ΓL | =  | (83)
|
| =  | (84)
|
| = i0.500 . | (85) |
Thus
The magnitude says that the reflected voltage-wave amplitude is half the incident amplitude. The
phase says that the reflected voltage at the load leads the incident voltage by 90∘.
Solution 6: reflected power, return loss, and SWR
Because reflected power is proportional to squared voltage amplitude,
For a lossless line and passive load, the delivered fraction is
The SWR is
| SWR | =  | (89)
|
| = 3.00 . | (90) |
The return loss is
| RL | = −20 log 10(0.5) | (91)
|
| = 6.02 dB . | (92) |
With |V +| = 10 V and real Z
0 = 50 Ω,
| P+ | =  | (93)
|
| =  | (94)
|
| = 1.00 W . | (95) |
The reflected wave has |V −| = |Γ||V +| = 5 V, so
| P− | = = 0.250 W . | (96) |
Hence
Solution 7: standing-wave maxima and minima
For a lossless line measured by distance d = −z from the load toward the generator,
Here
The envelope extrema are
| |V |max | = 4(1 + 0.5) = 6.00 V , | (100)
|
| |V |min | = 4(1 − 0.5) = 2.00 V . | (101) |
A maximum occurs when
For the nearest nonnegative distance, choose m = 0:
| dmax | =  | (103)
|
| =  | (104)
|
| =  | (105)
|
| = 0.0250 m . | (106) |
A minimum occurs when
The nearest positive solution uses m = −1:
| dmin | =  | (108)
|
| =  | (109)
|
| = 0.0750 m . | (110) |
Adjacent maxima are separated by
Solution 8: infer mismatch magnitude and phase from an SWR measurement
Invert the SWR relation:
| |ΓL| | =  | (112)
|
| =  | (113)
|
| = 0.4286 . | (114) |
For a voltage maximum at distance d from the load,
For the nearest maximum and the principal phase, use m = 0:
| ϕ | = 2βd | (116)
|
| = 2 d | (117)
|
| =  | (118)
|
| = . | (119) |
Therefore
SWR alone gives only the magnitude. A spatial reference such as a measured maximum location is
needed to recover the phase.
Solution 9: input impedance of a finite lossless line
Use
Since
we have
Therefore
Carrying out the complex division gives
The load itself has not changed; the line has transformed the voltage-current ratio observed at the
input plane.
Solution 10: quarter-wave impedance transformer
For a lossless quarter-wave section,
To make this equal to the 50 Ω feed impedance,
Thus
| Zt | =  | (128)
|
| = 70.71 Ω . | (129) |
Verification is immediate:
The transformer is narrowband because the quarter-wave condition is tied to frequency through
βℓ = π∕2.
Solution 11: short-circuited line
Set ZL = 0 in the lossless input-impedance equation:
| Zin | = Z0 | (131)
|
| = iZ0 tan(βℓ) . | (132) |
For ℓ = λ∕8,
so
The input appears purely inductive.
For ℓ = λ∕4,
and tan(π∕2) diverges, so ideally
The short has been transformed into an open.
For ℓ = λ∕2,
so
The original short repeats after one half wavelength.
Solution 12: open-circuited line
Take the limit ZL →∞ in
Divide numerator and denominator by ZL and take the limit:
| Zin | = Z0 | (140)
|
| = −iZ0 cot(βℓ). | (141) |
Thus
For ℓ = λ∕8,
so
The input appears purely capacitive.
For ℓ = λ∕4,
so
The open becomes a short.
For ℓ = λ∕2, cot π diverges, so
The original open repeats.
Solution 13: the quarter-wave impedance inverter
For
we have
Starting from
let T = tan(βℓ) and take the limit |T|→∞:
| Zin | = Z0 | (151)
|
| →Z0 | (152)
|
| = . | (153) |
Therefore, if ZL →∞,
and if ZL → 0,
The quarter-wave section is therefore an impedance inverter.
Solution 14: coaxial-line geometry to C, L, Z0, and velocity
The material parameters are
With 𝜖r = 2.25 and μr = 1,
The radius ratio is
so
Therefore
| C | =  | (160)
|
| = 1.0484 × 10−10 F/m | (161)
|
| = 104.84 pF/m , | (162) |
and
| L | = ln(b∕a) | (163)
|
| = 2.3878 × 10−7 H/m | (164)
|
| = 238.78 nH/m . | (165) |
Then
| Z0 | =  | (166)
|
| = 47.72 Ω . | (167) |
The wave speed is
| vp | =  | (168)
|
| = 1.999 × 108 m/s . | (169) |
Finally,
| LC | = (2.3878 × 10−7)(1.0484 × 10−10) | (170)
|
| ≈ 2.503 × 10−17 s2∕m2, | (171) |
while
| μ𝜖 | = (1.25664 × 10−6)(1.9922 × 10−11) | (172)
|
| ≈ 2.503 × 10−17 s2∕m2. | (173) |
Thus
which is the transmission-line form of the electromagnetic wave-speed relation.
Solution 15: design the coax radius ratio for 50 Ω
For a nonmagnetic dielectric,
Therefore
Solve for the ratio:
Using η0 ≈ 376.73 Ω,
| ln(b∕a) | =  | (178)
|
| ≈ 1.2507. | (179) |
Hence
For a = 0.500 mm,
| b | = (3.493)(0.500 mm) | (181)
|
| = 1.747 mm . | (182) |
The required impedance depends on the radius ratio, not on the absolute scale, so scaling both
radii by the same factor leaves ideal Z0 unchanged.
Solution 16: Julia sweep of load impedance and line length
One implementation is:
using Printf
Z0 = 50.0
println("Resistive-load sweep")
for ZL in range(10.0, 200.0, length=20)
Gamma = (ZL - Z0) / (ZL + Z0)
Rpow = abs2(Gamma)
swr = (1 + abs(Gamma)) / (1 - abs(Gamma))
@printf("ZL=%7.2f ohm Gamma=% .5f R=%7.5f SWR=%7.4f\n",
ZL, Gamma, Rpow, swr)
end
ZL = 30.0 + 40.0im
println("\nLength sweep for ZL = 30 + j40 ohm")
for ell_over_lambda in range(0.0, 0.5, length=21)
theta = 2*pi*ell_over_lambda
# Avoid the tan singularity exactly at lambda/4 by using the
# reflection-coefficient form when desired; ordinary complex
# arithmetic is sufficient away from the exact singular point.
if abs(cos(theta)) > 1e-10
t = tan(theta)
Zin = Z0 * (ZL + 1im*Z0*t) / (Z0 + 1im*ZL*t)
@printf("ell/lambda=%6.3f Zin=%9.3f %+.3fj ohm\n",
ell_over_lambda, real(Zin), imag(Zin))
end
end
GammaL = (ZL - Z0) / (ZL + Z0)
# Stable all-length form using Gamma at the observation plane:
function zin_from_gamma(Z0, GammaL, ell_over_lambda)
Gamma_in = GammaL * exp(-1im*4*pi*ell_over_lambda)
return Z0 * (1 + Gamma_in) / (1 - Gamma_in)
end
Zhalf = zin_from_gamma(Z0, GammaL, 0.5)
Zquarter = zin_from_gamma(Z0, GammaL, 0.25)
@printf("\nZin at lambda/2 = %.6f %+.6fj ohm\n",
real(Zhalf), imag(Zhalf))
@printf("expected ZL = %.6f %+.6fj ohm\n",
real(ZL), imag(ZL))
@printf("Zin at lambda/4 = %.6f %+.6fj ohm\n",
real(Zquarter), imag(Zquarter))
@printf("Z0^2/ZL = %.6f %+.6fj ohm\n",
real(Z0^2/ZL), imag(Z0^2/ZL))
For the fixed complex load,
At a half wavelength,
so the input reflection coefficient equals the load reflection coefficient and
At a quarter wavelength,
and the input impedance becomes
The numerical sweep therefore checks both periodicity and quarter-wave inversion without relying
only on symbolic algebra.
What EM22E1 adds to the series
EM22 derived the distributed-wave model. EM22E1 makes that model operational. The worked
problems connect physical line geometry to R,L,G,C, then to
The key conceptual point is that transmission-line effects are not corrections to ordinary lumped
circuits. They are wave phenomena. Once line dimensions and timing make propagation delay
important, voltage and current must be treated as traveling fields with phase, attenuation,
reflection, and interference.
This prepares the series for radiation from time-varying currents, where guided electromagnetic
energy leaves the transmission structure and becomes a freely propagating antenna
field.
References
References
[1] David M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 4th ed., Wiley, 2012.
[2] Robert E. Collin, Foundations for Microwave Engineering, 2nd ed., Wiley-IEEE
Press, 2001.
[3] Simon Ramo, John R. Whinnery, and Theodore Van Duzer, Fields and Waves in
Communication Electronics, 3rd ed., Wiley, 1994.
[4] Fawwaz T. Ulaby and Umberto Ravaioli, Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics,
7th ed., Pearson, 2015.
[5] Matthew N. O. Sadiku, Elements of Electromagnetics, 7th ed., Oxford University
Press, 2018.