Electromagnetic Waves, Antennas, and RF: The Laplacian and the 3D Wave Equation
The wave mechanics series developed the one-dimensional wave equation
That equation describes a field that varies along one spatial coordinate. Radio waves, however,
propagate through three-dimensional space. The purpose of EM04 is to replace the
one-dimensional curvature operator
with its three-dimensional counterpart, the Laplacian, and thereby obtain the three-dimensional
wave equation
The article remains deliberately mathematical. Maxwell’s equations have not yet been introduced.
Later in the series, Maxwell’s equations will show why electric and magnetic fields satisfy this same
wave-equation structure in source-free homogeneous regions [2, 5].
1 Why a second spatial derivative appeared in the 1D wave equation
For a one-dimensional field u(x,t), the first derivative
measures local slope. The second derivative
measures how that slope changes from point to point. Geometrically, it measures local curvature
along the x direction.
For a stretched string, this curvature enters the net transverse force and therefore the transverse
acceleration. The result derived in the Wave Mechanics series is
Written with the spatial term first,
The important structural lesson is that spatial curvature is tied to temporal acceleration.
Figure. The one-dimensional second derivative measures curvature along one spatial axis.
In three dimensions the Laplacian adds the second-derivative contributions from the three
Cartesian directions.
2 Second derivatives in three spatial dimensions
Consider a scalar field
At a fixed time, the field can curve independently along x, y, and z. The three Cartesian second
derivatives are
The simplest rotationally symmetric way to combine these Cartesian curvature contributions is to
add them:
This combination is the Cartesian Laplacian.
3 The Laplacian
The Laplacian of a scalar field is written
and in Cartesian coordinates is defined by
The notation ∇2 is read “del squared” or “the Laplacian.”
3.1 The Laplacian is divergence of the gradient
EM03 introduced
Take the divergence of this vector field:
| ∇⋅ (∇ψ) | =  +  +   | (14)
|
| = + + . | (15) |
Therefore,
This identity gives the Laplacian a useful interpretation: first form the field pointing toward fastest
increase, then ask whether that gradient field has local net outward flux.
Figure. The Laplacian maps a scalar field to another scalar field by taking the divergence
of its gradient.
3.2 Operator type
The gradient maps
while divergence maps
Therefore the Laplacian maps
This type check is useful whenever a long expression involving ∇ becomes difficult to
read.
3.3 Units
If ψ has units [ψ], then every spatial derivative contributes one inverse length. Therefore
This will match the right-hand side of the wave equation because
4 A geometric interpretation of the Laplacian
In one dimension, a positive second derivative means the curve is locally concave upward. A
negative second derivative means it is locally concave downward.
The Laplacian generalizes this idea by adding the local curvature contributions from independent
spatial directions. Roughly speaking:
| ∇2ψ | > 0 | | means the field is locally bowl-like, | (22)
|
| ∇2ψ | < 0 | | means the field is locally cap-like, | (23)
|
| ∇2ψ | = 0 | | means positive and negative curvature contributions balance locally. | (24) |
This interpretation is local. The Laplacian is not the field value itself, and a field can be nonzero
while its Laplacian is zero.
5 Worked example 1: Laplacian of a polynomial field
Let
The second derivatives are
Therefore,
| ∇2ψ | = 2 + 4 − 6 | (27)
|
| = 0. | (28) |
Hence
Notice that the mixed term 4xy contributes no second derivative to the Cartesian Laplacian
because
6 Harmonic fields
A scalar field satisfying
is called a harmonic field, and the equation itself is Laplace’s equation.
This equation appears throughout electrostatics, gravitation, steady heat flow, and potential
theory. It is not yet a wave equation because it contains no time derivative.
The distinction is important:
whereas
7 From the 1D wave equation to the 3D wave equation
The one-dimensional equation is
If a field may vary independently in all three spatial directions, replace the one-dimensional spatial
curvature by the Laplacian:
This gives
Equivalently,
This is the scalar three-dimensional wave equation in a homogeneous isotropic medium with
constant wave speed c [3, 6].
7.1 What the equation says physically
The equation equates two local quantities:
If the field bends spatially, the wave equation dictates how the field must accelerate in time.
Conversely, rapid temporal acceleration requires corresponding spatial curvature.
8 The 1D equation is contained inside the 3D equation
Suppose
so the field does not depend on y or z. Then
Therefore,
The 3D wave equation becomes
which is exactly the familiar one-dimensional result.
9 Worked example 2: reduce a 3D equation to 1D
Let
Because the field depends on z but not on x or y,
Thus even though the field exists in three-dimensional space, its spatial dependence is effectively
one-dimensional.
This distinction is important. A three-dimensional field need not vary in all three coordinates.
10 Plane waves in three dimensions
EM02 introduced the three-dimensional plane-wave phase
A scalar plane wave can therefore be written
Here
is the wave vector, and
is the scalar Wavenumber.
The constant-phase surfaces satisfy
at fixed time, so they are planes normal to k.
Figure. A plane wave has parallel constant-phase planes. The wave vector k is normal to
those planes and points in the propagation direction.
11 Verify that a plane wave satisfies the 3D wave equation
Let
where
Write
Differentiating twice with respect to x gives
Similarly,
and
Therefore,
| ∇2ψ | = − ψ | (56)
|
| = −k2ψ. | (57) |
Thus
Now differentiate twice with respect to time:
Substitute these into the 3D wave equation:
For a nonzero wave field,
Taking the positive-frequency branch,
This is the nondispersive dispersion relation for the ideal constant-speed wave equation.
12 Frequency, wavelength, and wave speed
Recall
and
Substituting into
gives
Hence
The familiar one-dimensional relation therefore survives unchanged in three dimensions. The new
information carried by k is the propagation direction.
13 Worked example 3: wave vector, wavelength, and direction
Suppose
The scalar wavenumber is
Therefore,
The propagation unit vector is
Thus
14 Worked example 4: determine frequency from a 3D wave vector
Suppose a wave travels with
and has
Then
The frequency is
| f | =  | (76)
|
| ≈ 1.574 × 109 Hz. | (77) |
Thus
This is close to the GPS L1 carrier frequency. The point here is not yet GPS link analysis, but the
direct connection among wave vector, wavelength, and radio frequency.
15 Any waveform can travel along a fixed direction
A sinusoid is not the only possible solution. Let
where n is a constant unit vector. Consider
Using the chain rule,
Taking the divergence,
Because n is a unit vector,
so
The time derivatives give
Hence
Therefore,
is a traveling-wave solution for any sufficiently smooth waveform F.
This is the three-dimensional counterpart of the one-dimensional traveling form F(x − ct).
16 Spherical waves: a preview of radiation spreading
Plane waves are useful locally and mathematically, but a compact source radiating into open
three-dimensional space does not produce infinite planar wavefronts. Far from an ideal point-like
source, the wavefronts are approximately spherical.
Away from the source point, for r > 0, a common outgoing spherical-wave form is
where
For a sinusoid,
The important new feature is the factor
The field amplitude decreases approximately as 1∕r because the wave spreads across larger
spherical surfaces as it propagates outward.
Figure. An outgoing spherical wave spreads over surfaces whose area grows as 4πr2. Field
amplitude scales approximately as 1∕r in the radiation region, while power flux later scales
as 1∕r2.
16.1 Why this matters for radio
If field amplitude scales as
and wave power density is proportional to field amplitude squared, then
Later articles will derive this carefully using electromagnetic energy flux and the Poynting vector.
This is the mathematical seed of free-space spreading loss and, eventually, the Friis transmission
equation.
17 Worked example 5: spherical-wave amplitude ratio
Suppose the far-field amplitude at r1 = 10 m is A1. At r2 = 40 m,
Thus
If power density is proportional to amplitude squared, then
This anticipates the inverse-square behavior that will become central to RF link budgets.
18 The radial Laplacian
The Cartesian definition of the Laplacian is fundamental, but spherical symmetry is easier to
describe using the radius r. If a scalar field depends only on r and t, then for r > 0 the Laplacian
reduces to
This formula will be derived more fully when spherical waves and radiation geometry are developed
in later articles. For now, it explains why the factor 1∕r naturally appears in outgoing
three-dimensional waves.
19 Worked example 6: the radial wave equation simplifies after multiplying by r
For spherical symmetry, the wave equation is
Define
Then
A direct differentiation gives
Also,
Therefore the radial wave equation becomes
So χ = rψ obeys an ordinary one-dimensional wave equation in the radial coordinate. An outgoing
solution is
which gives
This is the mathematical origin of the 1∕r spherical spreading factor.
20 Vector fields and the vector wave equation
Electromagnetism uses vector fields such as E and B. In Cartesian coordinates, the Laplacian of a
vector field can be applied component by component:
A vector wave equation therefore has the form
In a fixed Cartesian basis, this represents three scalar wave equations, one for each field
component.
Later, Maxwell’s equations will lead to wave equations of this form for the electric and magnetic
fields in source-free homogeneous media.
21 Worked example 7: a polarized vector plane wave
Consider
The only nonzero component is
Its Laplacian is
while
Therefore this component satisfies the wave equation when
Because the basis vector x is constant,
under the same condition.
This is an early mathematical model of a linearly polarized plane wave. The physical
reason that electromagnetic fields satisfy such an equation will come later from Maxwell’s
equations.
22 Common mistakes
22.1 Treating ∇2 as the square of an ordinary number
The notation
means a second-order differential operator. It is not ordinary multiplication of a numerical quantity
∇ by itself.
22.2 Forgetting that k and k are different objects
The vector
contains both direction and magnitude. The scalar
is the wavenumber appearing in
22.3 Assuming a 3D field must depend on all three coordinates
A field such as
can exist throughout three-dimensional space while varying only along z. The unused derivatives
simply vanish.
22.4 Confusing the Laplace equation with the wave equation
The equations
and
have different physical content. The first is time independent; the second describes propagation.
22.5 Forgetting the 1∕r amplitude factor for spherical waves
A sinusoidal phase
by itself does not describe the usual outgoing spherical solution in three dimensions. The
radiation-region solution includes the geometric spreading factor
23 Summary
The central results of EM04 are:
and
The scalar three-dimensional wave equation is
For a plane wave,
we found
and
which require
For a spherically spreading outgoing wave,
so field amplitude falls as 1∕r before any electromagnetic power calculation is introduced.
EM05 next moves from this mathematical field language to the first electromagnetic field itself:
Electric Charge and the Electric Field.
References
[1] H. M. Schey, Div, Grad, Curl, and All That, 4th ed., W. W. Norton & Company,
2005.
[2] David J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, 4th ed., Cambridge University
Press, 2017.
[3] Walter A. Strauss, Partial Differential Equations: An Introduction, 2nd ed., Wiley,
2007.
[4] Gilbert Strang and Edwin “Jed” Herman, Calculus, Volume 3, OpenStax, 2016,
chapters on vector calculus and second-order differential operators.
[5] Samuel J. Ling, Jeff Sanny, and William Moebs, University Physics, Volume 2,
OpenStax, 2016, chapters on electromagnetic waves.
[6] Frank S. Crawford, Jr., Waves, Berkeley Physics Course, Volume 3, McGraw-Hill,
1968.
[7] Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 8.03SC Physics III: Vibrations and Waves,
MIT OpenCourseWare, materials on wave equations and traveling waves.