Color in Astrophysics: Worked Examples and Complete Solutions
This companion develops practical skill with photometric colors, flux ratios, reddening, blackbody
color, uncertainty propagation, and unresolved binary systems.
Unless a problem explicitly names a standard photometric system, idealized examples that convert
color directly to a flux-density ratio should be interpreted as AB-like comparisons in which the
same reference flux density applies to both bands.
Part I: Problems
Problem 1: calculate a color index
A star has
| mB | = 10.43, | (1)
|
| mV | = 9.78. | (2) |
Calculate B − V .
State whether the source is redder or bluer than an object with B − V = 0.20.
Problem 2: color to flux-density ratio
Two idealized AB bands X and Y give
Find
Problem 3: flux-density ratio to color
An idealized AB observation gives
Find mX − mY .
Problem 4: intrinsic color and color excess
A star has
| (B − V )obs | = 0.62, | (6)
|
| (B − V )0 | = 0.30. | (7) |
Find E(B − V ).
If an extinction law with
is assumed for this example, estimate AV and AB.
Problem 5: deredden a measured color
A source has
| g − r | = 1.10, | (9)
|
| E(g − r) | = 0.24. | (10) |
Find the intrinsic color (g − r)0.
Problem 6: idealized blackbody color
Treat two narrow AB-like bands as monochromatic measurements at
| λX | = 450 nm, | (11)
|
| λY | = 650 nm. | (12) |
For a blackbody at
use the Planck function per unit frequency,
to estimate the idealized color
Problem 7: compare two blackbody temperatures
Repeat Problem 6 for
Which blackbody is bluer?
Problem 8: color as a spectral slope
A source has
in two idealized AB bands centered at 450 nm and 650 nm.
Assume
Estimate α.
Problem 9: color uncertainty
A source has
| mX | = 15.42 ± 0.02, | (19)
|
| mY | = 14.88 ± 0.03. | (20) |
Assuming independent errors, calculate the color and its uncertainty.
Problem 10: unresolved binary color
In two idealized bands, star 1 has flux densities
| fX,1 | = 1.00, | (21)
|
| fY,1 | = 1.00, | (22) |
while star 2 has
| fX,2 | = 0.20, | (23)
|
| fY,2 | = 0.50. | (24) |
All flux densities are in the same arbitrary units.
Calculate:
- the color of star 1;
- the color of star 2;
- the unresolved combined color.
Show that the combined color is not the arithmetic average of the two component colors.
Problem 11: equal-component binary in a color-magnitude diagram
Two identical stars are unresolved.
Each component has color
and absolute magnitude
Find the unresolved system’s:
- color;
- Y -band absolute magnitude.
Problem 12: color change during eclipse
An unresolved binary has out-of-eclipse fluxes
| FX | = 10.0, | (27)
|
| FY | = 12.0. | (28) |
During primary eclipse, the hotter component is partially hidden and the fluxes become
| FX | = 6.0, | (29)
|
| FY | = 9.0. | (30) |
Assume identical AB-like zero points.
Calculate the color before and during eclipse.
Does the system become bluer or redder?
Figure 1. Binary star colors must be calculated after adding the component fluxes in each band.
Part II: Complete Solutions
Solution 1
By definition,
| B − V | = mB − mV | (31)
|
| = 10.43 − 9.78 | (32)
|
| = 0.65. | (33) |
Compared with
the source with B − V = 0.65 has the larger blue-minus-visual color and is therefore
redder.
Solution 2
For an idealized AB color,
Therefore
 | = 10−0.4(0.65) | (36)
|
| ≈ 0.550. | (37) |
The source has only about 55 percent as much AB flux density in X as in Y .
Figure 2. A positive short-minus-long wavelength AB color corresponds to a smaller flux density
in the shorter-wavelength band.
Solution 3
Use
| mX − mY | = −2.5 log 10(2.50) | (38)
|
| ≈−0.995. | (39) |
The negative color indicates that the source is relatively strong in band X.
Solution 4
The color excess is
| E(B − V ) | = (B − V )obs − (B − V )0 | (40)
|
| = 0.62 − 0.30 | (41)
|
| = 0.32. | (42) |
With the assumed illustrative value
| AV | = RV E(B − V ) | (44)
|
| = 3.1(0.32) | (45)
|
| = 0.992 mag. | (46) |
Since
we obtain
| AB | = AV + E(B − V ) | (48)
|
| = 0.992 + 0.32 | (49)
|
| = 1.312 mag. | (50) |
The larger blue-band extinction is what makes the observed color redder.
Solution 5
The intrinsic color is
| (g − r)0 | = (g − r) − E(g − r) | (51)
|
| = 1.10 − 0.24 | (52)
|
| = 0.86. | (53) |
Figure 3. Dereddening subtracts the appropriate color excess and moves the observed color back
toward the intrinsic spectral energy distribution.
Solution 6
For
| λX | = 450 nm, | (54)
|
| λY | = 650 nm, | (55) |
the frequencies are
Using the Planck function at
the ratio is approximately
Therefore
| mX − mY | = −2.5 log 10(0.573) | (59)
|
| ≈ 0.605. | (60) |
This is an idealized monochromatic AB-like color, not a calibrated Johnson, SDSS, or Gaia
color.
Figure 4. Increasing blackbody temperature shifts the short-to-long wavelength flux ratio and
therefore changes the measured color.
Solution 7
At
the same two wavelengths give approximately
Thus
| mX − mY | = −2.5 log 10(1.046) | (63)
|
| ≈−0.049. | (64) |
The 10000 K blackbody has the smaller, more negative color and is therefore bluer than the 6000
K blackbody.
Solution 8
For a power law,
Since
we obtain
| α | = − | (67)
|
| ≈−1.00. | (68) |
Thus the flux density behaves approximately as
Solution 9
The color is
| mX − mY | = 15.42 − 14.88 | (70)
|
| = 0.54. | (71) |
For independent errors,
| σC | =  | (72)
|
| ≈ 0.036. | (73) |
Therefore
to two significant figures in the uncertainty.
Solution 10
For star 1,
| C1 | = −2.5 log 10 | (75)
|
| = 0. | (76) |
For star 2,
| C2 | = −2.5 log 10 | (77)
|
| = −2.5 log 10(0.40) | (78)
|
| ≈ 0.995. | (79) |
The unresolved fluxes are
| FX,tot | = 1.20, | (80)
|
| FY,tot | = 1.50. | (81) |
Therefore
| Ctot | = −2.5 log 10 | (82)
|
| = −2.5 log 10(0.80) | (83)
|
| ≈ 0.242. | (84) |
The arithmetic average of the component colors would be
which is not the correct combined color.
Fluxes must be added first.
Solution 11
Because the two stars are identical, doubling both band fluxes leaves their ratio unchanged.
Therefore
The total flux in band Y doubles, so the magnitude changes by
| ΔMY | = −2.5 log 102 | (87)
|
| ≈−0.753. | (88) |
Thus
| MY,tot | = 5.00 − 0.753 | (89)
|
| = 4.247. | (90) |
The unresolved equal-component binary moves vertically upward in a color-magnitude diagram
while retaining the same color.
Solution 12
Out of eclipse,
| Cout | = −2.5 log 10 | (91)
|
| ≈ 0.198. | (92) |
During eclipse,
| Cecl | = −2.5 log 10 | (93)
|
| ≈ 0.440. | (94) |
The color becomes more positive:
Therefore the system becomes
This is consistent with preferentially removing Light from a hotter, bluer component.
Part III: Additional conceptual checks
Check 1: does distance change color?
If there is no wavelength-dependent extinction and the same source is simply moved farther away,
both band fluxes decrease by the same inverse-square factor.
The flux ratio is unchanged.
Therefore the color is unchanged.
Check 2: can two stars have the same color but different luminosities?
Yes.
Two stars can have similar spectral shapes and therefore similar colors while having different radii
and total luminosities.
Color is primarily a spectral-shape measurement, not a total-power measurement.
Check 3: can reddening mimic a cooler star?
Yes.
Dust can make a hot source appear redder.
This creates a temperature-reddening degeneracy that often requires additional colors, spectra, or
distance information to break.
Check 4: why use several colors?
One color gives one coarse spectral slope.
Several independent colors sample more of the spectral energy distribution and can help separate
temperature, extinction, metallicity, and unusual spectral features.
Summary of useful formulas
for independent magnitude errors, and
before calculating the color of an unresolved multiple system.
References
References
[1] B. W. Carroll and D. A. Ostlie, An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics, 2nd ed.,
Cambridge University Press, 2017.
[2] M. S. Bessell, Standard Photometric Systems, Annual Review of Astronomy and
Astrophysics, 43, 293–336, 2005.
[3] M. S. Bessell, F. Castelli, and B. Plez, Model atmospheres broad-band colors,
bolometric corrections and temperature calibrations for O–M stars, Astronomy and
Astrophysics, 333, 231–250, 1998.