|
Main Menu
|
Sections
Talkback
Downloads
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
The operation is bilinear, and it is easy to verify that
Assume now that is an equivariant cochain; for ow
we have
, then
Thus, in this case,
(7.3)
and
.
Consequently, the definition of extends to the case of , an equi- variant cochain, and an element of
;the relation (7.2) holds for this extended operation.
Now take
and
, then
is defined as the reduction by of the
power of . Suppose that is a cocycle, then
is an equivariant cocycle, and if is a cycle, it follows from (7.2) that
is a cocycle. Moreover, if the cycle is varied by a boundary, then (7.2) implies that
varies by a co- boundary. If is varied by a coboundary
also varies by a coboundary. We only remark here that the proof of this last fact requires a special argument and is not, as in the preceding case, an immediate consequence of (7.2). Thus the class
is a function of the classes
, and it is independent of the particular , since by (3.1) any two choices of are equivariantly homotopic. Then Steenrod defines
, the reduction by of the
power of , by
This gives the Steenrod reduced power operations; they are operations defined for
and
, and the value is
In general, the reduced powers are linear operations in , but may not be linear in . We will list some of their
rties. Unless otherwise stated, we assume and as above.
First, we have
(7.4) if .
Let
be a map and
, the induced homomorphism; then
This result implies topological invariance for reduced powers
OCR based on this tiff scan
|
"test ocr" is owned by bloftin.
|
|
Cross-references: topological, homomorphism, function, boundary, power, relation, operation
This is version 2 of test ocr, born on 2009-02-07, modified 2009-02-07.
Object id is 502, canonical name is TestOcr.
Accessed 335 times total.
Classification:
|
|
|
|
Pending Errata and Addenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|