Let and be polynomials with the degree of the former less than the degree of the latter.
- If all complex zeroes
of are simple, then
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05fac/05fac57cf7b62a6ce196ae2f52e0d151cea80ac0" alt="$\displaystyle \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{P(s)}{Q(s)}\right\} \;=\; \sum_{j=1}^n\frac{P(a_j)}{Q'(a_j)}e^{a_jt}.$ $\displaystyle \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{P(s)}{Q(s)}\right\} \;=\; \sum_{j=1}^n\frac{P(a_j)}{Q'(a_j)}e^{a_jt}.$" |
(1) |
- If the different zeroes
of have the multiplicities
, respectively, we denote
; then
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fcd8/0fcd8b0b411334c26e3f03a5ac05415d02adf45d" alt="$\displaystyle \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{P(s)}{Q(s)}\right\} \;=\; \sum_{j=1}... ...um_{k=0}^{m_j-1}\frac{F_j^{(k)}(a_j)t^{m_j\!-\!1\!-\!k}}{k!(m_j\!-\!1\!-\!k)!}.$ $\displaystyle \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{P(s)}{Q(s)}\right\} \;=\; \sum_{j=1}... ...um_{k=0}^{m_j-1}\frac{F_j^{(k)}(a_j)t^{m_j\!-\!1\!-\!k}}{k!(m_j\!-\!1\!-\!k)!}.$" |
(2) |
A special case of the Heaviside formula (1) is
Example. Since the zeros of the binomial
are
, we obtain
Proof of (1). Without hurting the generality, we can suppose that is monic. Therefore
For
, denoting
one has
. We have a partial fraction expansion of the form
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53585/53585b0750bbfa801a5489a122888d88286bdd28" alt="$\displaystyle \frac{P(s)}{Q(s)} \;=\; \frac{C_1}{s\!-\!a_1}+\frac{C_2}{s\!-\!a_2}+\ldots+\frac{C_n}{s\!-\!a_n}$ $\displaystyle \frac{P(s)}{Q(s)} \;=\; \frac{C_1}{s\!-\!a_1}+\frac{C_2}{s\!-\!a_2}+\ldots+\frac{C_n}{s\!-\!a_n}$" |
(3) |
with constants . According to the linearity and the formula 1 of the parent entry, one gets
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2df03/2df03fe53bb0eed03e4285ce26217d4af1051b0c" alt="$\displaystyle \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{P(s)}{Q(s)}\right\} \;=\; \sum_{j=1}^nC_je^{a_jt}.$ $\displaystyle \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{P(s)}{Q(s)}\right\} \;=\; \sum_{j=1}^nC_je^{a_jt}.$" |
(4) |
For determining the constants , multiply (3) by . It yields
Setting to this identity gives the value
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e12e/2e12e830efb9c994553140a05c947046602fed84" alt="$\displaystyle C_j \;=; \frac{P(a_j)}{Q_j(a_j)}.$ $\displaystyle C_j \;=; \frac{P(a_j)}{Q_j(a_j)}.$" |
(5) |
But since
, we see that
; thus the equation (5) may be written
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93de6/93de655be247b0ada2ce77dcc90d0b66128dfbc4" alt="$\displaystyle C_j ;=\; \frac{P(a_j)}{Q'(a_j)}.$ $\displaystyle C_j ;=\; \frac{P(a_j)}{Q'(a_j)}.$" |
(6) |
The values (6) in (4) produce the formula (1).
- 1
- K. V¨AISÄLÄ: Laplace-muunnos. Handout Nr. 163. Teknillisen korkeakoulun ylioppilaskunta, Otaniemi, Finland (1968).
|