Luminosity: Worked Examples and Complete Solutions
This companion develops numerical skill with the luminosity relations introduced in the definition
article.
Unless otherwise stated, use
| L⊙ | = 3.828 × 1026 W, | (1)
|
| R⊙ | = 6.957 × 108 m, | (2)
|
| Teff,⊙ | = 5772 K, | (3)
|
| 1 au | = 1.495978707 × 1011 m, | (4)
|
| 1 pc | = 3.085677581 × 1016 m, | (5)
|
| σ | = 5.670374419 × 10−8 W m−2 K−4. | (6) |
Part I: Problems
Problem 1: energy radiated by the Sun
Using the nominal solar luminosity, calculate how much energy the Sun radiates in:
- one second;
- one hour;
- one Julian year.
Problem 2: solar flux at one astronomical unit
Treat the Sun as an isotropic emitter.
Use
to calculate the solar bolometric flux at one astronomical unit.
Problem 3: infer luminosity from flux and parallax
A star has measured bolometric flux
and parallax
Assume the simple high-signal-to-noise inversion
Find:
- the distance in parsecs;
- the luminosity in watts;
- the luminosity in solar units.
Problem 4: luminosity from radius and effective temperature
A star has
| R | = 2.00R⊙, | (11)
|
| Teff | = 6500 K. | (12) |
Use
to find L∕L⊙.
Problem 5: infer stellar radius
A star has
| L | = 25L⊙, | (14)
|
| Teff | = 8000 K. | (15) |
Find its radius in solar radii.
Problem 6: equal-luminosity unresolved binary
Two identical stars each have luminosity
They are unresolved.
Find:
- the total luminosity;
- the magnitude difference between the unresolved pair and one component.
Problem 7: unequal unresolved binary
An unresolved binary has
| L1 | = 4.0L⊙, | (17)
|
| L2 | = 1.0L⊙. | (18) |
Find:
- the total luminosity;
- how many magnitudes brighter the unresolved system is than star 1 alone.
Problem 8: spectral luminosity conversion
At wavelength
a source has spectral luminosity
Find the corresponding:
- Lλ in W m−1;
- Lλ in W nm−1.
Problem 9: luminosity uncertainty from flux and distance
A source has
| F | = (4.00 ± 0.08) × 10−12 W m−2, | (21)
|
| d | = 100.0 ± 2.0 pc. | (22) |
Estimate the fractional luminosity uncertainty using first-order independent-error propagation.
Problem 10: luminosity uncertainty from radius and temperature
A star has independently measured
 | = 1.0%, | (23)
|
 | = 1.0%. | (24) |
Estimate the fractional uncertainty in luminosity inferred from
Problem 11: bolometric magnitude
A star has
Using
find its bolometric absolute magnitude.
Problem 12: a complete binary star luminosity example
A detached binary contains:
| R1 | = 1.20R⊙, | T1 | = 6200 K, | (28)
|
| R2 | = 0.90R⊙, | T2 | = 5200 K. | (29) |
The system is at
Assume both stars radiate according to the effective-temperature relation.
Calculate:
- L1∕L⊙;
- L2∕L⊙;
- total luminosity;
- bolometric flux at Earth;
- the magnitude brightening caused by adding star 2 to star 1.
Figure 1. In an unresolved binary, energy outputs add linearly even though astronomical
magnitudes combine logarithmically.
Part II: Complete Solutions
Solution 1
Luminosity is energy per unit time:
For one second,
For one hour,
| E1h | = (3.828 × 1026)(3600) | (33)
|
| = 1.378 × 1030 J. | (34) |
A Julian year is
Therefore
| E1yr | = (3.828 × 1026)(31557600) | (36)
|
| ≈ 1.208 × 1034 J. | (37) |
Solution 2
Use
Substituting the nominal values,
| F | =  | (39)
|
| ≈ 1361 W m−2. | (40) |
This is the expected scale of the total solar irradiance near Earth.
Figure 2. Solar luminosity is an intrinsic power, while the solar flux at Earth follows from
geometric spreading over a sphere of radius one astronomical unit.
Solution 3
The distance is
| d | =  | (41)
|
| = 50.0 pc. | (42) |
Convert to meters:
| d | = 50.0(3.085677581 × 1016) | (43)
|
| = 1.54284 × 1018 m. | (44) |
Then
| L | = 4πd2F | (45)
|
| = 4π(1.54284 × 1018)2(1.28 × 10−11) | (46)
|
| ≈ 3.83 × 1026 W. | (47) |
Therefore
The numbers were deliberately chosen to produce a solar-luminosity example.
Solution 4
Use
 | = (2.00)2 4 | (49)
|
| ≈ 4(1.1261)4 | (50)
|
| ≈ 6.43. | (51) |
Thus the star radiates about 6.4 times the solar luminosity.
Figure 3. Stellar luminosity grows quadratically with radius and with the fourth power of effective
temperature.
Solution 5
Start with
Solve for radius:
Substitute the values:
 | =  | (54)
|
| ≈ 2.60. | (55) |
Solution 6
Luminosities add:
The magnitude change is
| ΔM | = −2.5 log 10 | (57)
|
| = −2.5 log 102 | (58)
|
| ≈−0.753 mag. | (59) |
The unresolved pair is 0.753 magnitudes brighter than one component.
Solution 7
The total luminosity is
Relative to star 1,
| ΔM | = −2.5 log 10 | (61)
|
| ≈−0.242 mag. | (62) |
Thus adding the one-solar-luminosity companion makes the unresolved system about 0.24
magnitudes brighter than the primary alone.
Solution 8
Use
With
| c | = 2.99792458 × 108 ms−1, | (64)
|
| λ | = 550 × 10−9 m, | (65) |
we obtain
| Lλ | = (2.00 × 1012) | (66)
|
| ≈ 1.982 × 1033 W m−1. | (67) |
Since
the luminosity per nanometer is
Solution 9
The fractional flux uncertainty is
The fractional distance uncertainty is
Therefore
 | ≈ | (72)
|
| =  | (73)
|
| = 0.0447. | (74) |
Thus the luminosity uncertainty is approximately
Distance dominates even though the fractional distance and flux errors are equal.
Figure 4. Distance uncertainty enters the luminosity relation with a factor of two, while
temperature uncertainty enters stellar luminosity with a factor of four.
Solution 10
Use
Thus
 | ≈ | (77)
|
| =  | (78)
|
| = 0.0447. | (79) |
So the luminosity uncertainty is again about
The temperature error contributes more strongly because of the fourth power.
Solution 11
Use
Therefore
| Mbol | = 4.74 − 2.5 log 10(100) | (82)
|
| = 4.74 − 5.00 | (83)
|
| = −0.26. | (84) |
Solution 12
For star 1,
 | = (1.20)2 4 | (85)
|
| ≈ 1.92. | (86) |
For star 2,
 | = (0.90)2 4 | (87)
|
| ≈ 0.534. | (88) |
Thus
In SI units,
| Ltot | ≈ 2.45(3.828 × 1026) | (90)
|
| ≈ 9.39 × 1026 W. | (91) |
The distance is
| d | = 40.0(3.085677581 × 1016) | (92)
|
| = 1.23427 × 1018 m. | (93) |
The bolometric flux is
| Fbol | =  | (94)
|
| ≈ 4.90 × 10−11 W m−2. | (95) |
The magnitude brightening relative to star 1 alone is
| ΔM | = −2.5 log 10 | (96)
|
| ≈−0.266 mag. | (97) |
Even a substantially fainter secondary therefore shifts the unresolved system upward in
luminosity.
Part III: Additional conceptual checks
Check 1
If two otherwise identical stars are placed at 10 pc and 100 pc, which has the greater
luminosity?
They have the same luminosity.
The more distant star has a flux smaller by
Check 2
If stellar radius doubles while effective temperature stays fixed, luminosity changes
by
Check 3
If effective temperature doubles while radius stays fixed, luminosity changes by
Check 4
Can a star have high luminosity but low observed flux?
Yes.
A sufficiently large distance can make the received flux small.
This is precisely why luminosity and flux must be kept conceptually separate.
Summary of useful formulas
References
References
[1] B. W. Carroll and D. A. Ostlie, An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics, 2nd ed.,
Cambridge University Press, 2017.
[2] G. B. Rybicki and A. P. Lightman, Radiative Processes in Astrophysics, Wiley, 1979.
[3] International Astronomical Union, Resolution B3 on Recommended Nominal
Conversion Constants for Selected Solar and Planetary Properties, 2015.
[4] International Astronomical Union, Resolution B2 on Recommended Zero Points for
the Absolute and Apparent Bolometric Magnitude Scales, 2015.