In the examples that follow, show that the given vector field U is lamellar everywhere in ℝ3 and
determine its scalar potential u.
Example 1. Given
| U := y i + (x + sin z) j + y cos z k. | | |
For the rotor (curl) of the field we obtain ∇×U =
=
i +
j +
k,
which is identically 0 for all x, y, z. Thus, by the definition given in the parent entry, U is
lamellar.
Since ∇u = U, the scalar potential u = u(x, y, z) must satisfy the conditions
Thus we can write
where C1 may depend on y or z. Differentiating this result with respect to y and comparing to the
second condition, we get
Accordingly,
where C2 may depend on z. So
Differentiating this result with respect to z and comparing to the third condition yields
This means that C2 is an arbitrary constant. Thus the form
expresses the required potential function.
Example 2. This is a particular case in ℝ2:
| U(x, y, 0) := ωy i + ωxj, ω = constant | | |
Now, ∇×U =
=
k = 0, and so U is lamellar.
Therefore there exists a potential field u with U = ∇u. We deduce successively:
Thus we get the result
which corresponds to a particular case in ℝ2.
Example 3. Given
| U := axi + byj − (a + b)z)k. | | |
The rotor is now ∇×U =
= 0. From ∇u = U we obtain
Differentiating (1) and (2) with respect to z and using (3) give
We substitute (1′) and (2′) again into (1) and (2) and deduce as follows:
putting (1′′), (2′′) into (1), (2) then gives us
whence, by comparing, C1 = C2 = C, so that by (3), the expression h(x,y) and u itself have been
found, that is,
Unlike Example 1, the last two examples are also solenoidal, i.e. ∇⋅U = 0, which physically may
be interpreted as the continuity equation of an incompressible fluid flow.
Example 4. An additional example of a lamellar field would be
with a differentiable function v : ℝ → ℝ; if v is a constant, then U is also solenoidal.