Wave Mechanics: Initial Conditions and the d’Alembert Solution
WM16 established the structural form of a sufficiently smooth solution of the one-dimensional
constant-speed wave equation,
namely
The two arbitrary functions represent independent right- and left-moving components. The
remaining question is physical as well as mathematical:
The answer is the classical d’Alembert formula for the initial-value problem on the whole line.
If
and
then, under the usual smoothness assumptions,
This formula solves the initial-value problem explicitly and makes finite propagation speed visible
in the mathematics [4, 3, 6].
1 Why two initial conditions are needed
The wave equation contains a second derivative with respect to time. Just as a second-order
Ordinary Differential Equation generally requires an initial position and an initial velocity, the
wave equation requires two initial functions:
and
The function f(x) describes the initial shape of the string or wave field. The function g(x)
describes the initial velocity of every material point.
The logical structure is summarized below.
Figure. The wave equation supplies the two traveling families. Initial displacement and
initial velocity determine how those families are combined.
2 Apply the initial displacement
Begin with the WM16 form
At t = 0,
The initial displacement condition therefore gives
This is one relation between the two unknown functions.
3 Apply the initial velocity
Differentiate the general solution with respect to time:
At t = 0,
The initial velocity condition therefore gives
Divide by c:
Meanwhile, differentiating
with respect to x gives
We now have two algebraic equations for the two unknown derivative functions F′ and
G′.
4 Solve for the two traveling components
Add the two equations:
| F′ + G′ | = f′, | (18)
|
| − F′ + G′ | = . | (19) |
This gives
so
Subtracting instead gives
so
Integrating with respect to the argument gives, for a convenient fixed reference point
x∗,
and
The displacement condition requires the constants to satisfy
Only the sum F + G matters physically, so the arbitrary constant split cancels from the final
solution.
5 Derive the d’Alembert formula
Substitute x − ct into F and x + ct into G:
| u(x,t) | = f(x − ct) + f(x + ct) | (27)
|
| − ∫
x∗x−ctg(s) ds + ∫
x∗x+ctg(s) ds. | (28) |
Using
we obtain
This is the d’Alembert solution of the one-dimensional wave equation initial-value problem on the
whole line [4, 6].
6 Interpret the displacement term
First suppose the initial velocity is zero:
Then
The initial shape splits into two copies. One moves right, one moves left, and each has half the
original amplitude.
At t = 0 the copies overlap exactly:
The splitting is illustrated below.
Figure. With zero initial velocity, the initial displacement profile separates into equal
right- and left-moving half-amplitude copies.
This result is one of the clearest physical interpretations of the d’Alembert formula.
7 Interpret the velocity term
Now suppose the initial displacement is zero:
Then
The displacement at (x,t) depends on the accumulated initial velocity over the interval
Figure. The initial-velocity contribution is determined by the integral of g(s) over the
characteristic interval from x − ct to x + ct.
The width of that interval is
As time increases, information from a larger portion of the initial line can influence the observation
point.
8 Domain of dependence and finite propagation speed
For a point (x0,t0), the d’Alembert formula uses initial data only between
and
These endpoints are reached by the two backward characteristic lines.
Figure. The value at (x0,t0) depends only on initial data in the interval [x0 − ct0,x0 + ct0].
This is the domain of dependence for the one-dimensional constant-speed wave equation.
Therefore a disturbance in the initial data cannot influence arbitrarily distant points
instantaneously. Information propagates at the finite speed c.
This causal structure is one of the most important qualitative consequences of the wave equation
[4].
9 Pure one-way motion requires compatible initial data
The d’Alembert formula also reveals the initial-data condition for a wave to travel in only one
direction.
For a pure right-moving wave,
At t = 0,
and
Therefore
Similarly,
This explains why an arbitrary initial shape by itself does not usually travel in only one direction.
The initial velocity must be chosen consistently with the desired direction.
10 Checking the initial conditions directly
A useful consistency check is to set t = 0 in the d’Alembert formula:
| u(x, 0) | = [f(x) + f(x)] + ∫
xxg(s) ds | (45)
|
| = f(x). | (46) |
Thus the displacement condition is satisfied.
To check the velocity, differentiate the formula with respect to time. The displacement part
gives
For the integral term, the Leibniz rule gives
 ![[ ∫ x+ct ]
-1-
2c x−ct g(s)ds](https://images.physicslibrary.org/cache/objects/1181/make4ht/WaveMechanicsInitialConditionsAndTheDAlembertSolution49x.png) | =  ![[cg(x + ct) + cg (x − ct)]](https://images.physicslibrary.org/cache/objects/1181/make4ht/WaveMechanicsInitialConditionsAndTheDAlembertSolution51x.png) | (48)
|
| = [g(x + ct) + g(x − ct)]. | (49) |
At t = 0, the two f′ terms cancel and the velocity term becomes
Therefore
11 The role of boundaries
The formula derived here is most naturally stated for the initial-value problem on the entire real
line.
On a finite interval, boundary conditions also matter. Reflections from fixed or free boundaries can
be incorporated through reflected extensions, mode expansions, or other boundary-value methods.
The PhysicsLibrary treatment of boundary conditions in WM12 explains why endpoint constraints
modify which solutions are physically allowed.
Thus
12 Regularity assumptions
The derivation above assumes enough differentiability for the chain rule, mixed derivatives, and the
classical wave equation to be meaningful. A common sufficient setting is to take f twice
continuously differentiable and g continuously differentiable.
Less regular initial data can also be treated using weaker notions of solution, but that belongs to a
more advanced PDE treatment [4].
13 Worked example 1: released Gaussian displacement
Suppose
and
The d’Alembert formula immediately gives
| u(x,t) | = exp ![[ ]
(x − ct)2
− -----2---
a](https://images.physicslibrary.org/cache/objects/1181/make4ht/WaveMechanicsInitialConditionsAndTheDAlembertSolution59x.png) | (55)
|
| + exp . | (56) |
Therefore the initial Gaussian separates into two Gaussian pulses of amplitude A∕2 traveling in
opposite directions at speed c:
At t = 0, the two halves add to recover the original amplitude A.
14 Worked example 2: zero displacement but sinusoidal initial velocity
Suppose
and
Then
Integrate:
| u(x,t) | =  . | (61) |
Using
we obtain
Since
this is a standing-wave form:
Different initial data can therefore generate a standing pattern even though the underlying solution
is still built from right- and left-moving components.
15 Worked example 3: choose data for a pure right-moving pulse
Suppose the desired initial shape is
To make it move purely to the right, choose
Differentiate:
Therefore
With this compatible initial velocity, the left-moving component vanishes and
The entire initial pulse moves right without splitting.
16 Worked example 4: evaluate the formula numerically
Let
with initial data
and
Find u(1.0 m, 0.25 s).
First compute the characteristic endpoints:
| x − ct | = 1.0 − (2.0)(0.25) = 0.50 m, | (74)
|
| x + ct | = 1.0 + (2.0)(0.25) = 1.50 m. | (75) |
The displacement contribution is
[f(0.50) + f(1.50)] | = [0.502 + 1.502] | (76)
|
| = [0.25 + 2.25] | (77)
|
| = 1.25. | (78) |
The velocity contribution is
∫
0.501.503sds | =  0.501.50 | (79)
|
| =  ![[ ]
3(2.25 − 0.25 )
2](https://images.physicslibrary.org/cache/objects/1181/make4ht/WaveMechanicsInitialConditionsAndTheDAlembertSolution87x.png) | (80)
|
| = 0.75. | (81) |
Therefore
in the displacement units implied by the chosen initial data.
17 Worked example 5: choose data for a pure left-moving wave
Suppose
To obtain only a left-moving wave, choose
Since
we require
The resulting solution is
or, using ω = ck,
The initial velocity therefore determines which of the two characteristic families survives.
18 Worked example 6: connect d’Alembert’s solution to string mechanics
A string has
and
Its wave speed is
| c | =  | (91)
|
| =  | (92)
|
| =  | (93)
|
| ≈ 94.9 m/s . | (94) |
Suppose the initial displacement is
and the initial velocity is zero.
Then
| u(x,t) | = 0.005 cos[4(x − ct)] | (96)
|
| + 0.005 cos[4(x + ct)]. | (97) |
Using the cosine sum identity,
The angular frequency is
| ω | = ck | (99)
|
| = (94.9)(4) | (100)
|
| ≈ 380 rad/s . | (101) |
Thus
The same result can be viewed either as two counter-propagating traveling waves or as a
standing-wave pattern generated by the specified initial data.
19 Common mistakes
- Mistake: using only the initial displacement. A second-order-in-time wave equation
also requires the initial velocity.
- Mistake: forgetting the factor 1∕2 multiplying the two displaced copies of f.
- Mistake: reversing the limits of the velocity integral. The correct interval is from x−ct
to x + ct.
- Mistake: forgetting the factor 1∕(2c) in front of the velocity integral.
- Mistake: assuming zero initial velocity produces one traveling copy of f. It produces
equal left- and right-moving half-amplitude copies.
- Mistake: using the whole-line formula without considering finite-domain boundary
conditions.
- Mistake: assuming arbitrary f and g produce a pure one-way wave. Pure right- or
left-moving motion requires the compatibility conditions g = ∓cf′.
20 What WM17 establishes
The structural solution from WM16,
becomes a complete initial-value solution once the functions
and
are specified:
The formula exposes three major physical ideas at once:
- waves propagate along two characteristic directions,
- information travels at finite speed c, and
- both initial displacement and initial velocity are required to determine the subsequent
motion.
This completes the basic initial-value solution of the one-dimensional ideal wave equation and
prepares the way for later treatments of energy transport, interfaces, modal expansions, Fourier
methods, and dispersive wave systems.
References
References
[1] A. P. French, Vibrations and Waves, M.I.T. Introductory Physics Series, W. W.
Norton & Company, 1971.
[2] Frank S. Crawford, Jr., Waves, Berkeley Physics Course, Volume 3, McGraw-Hill,
1968.
[3] Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures
on Physics, Volume I, Chapter 47, “Sound. The Wave Equation.”
[4] Walter A. Strauss, Partial Differential Equations: An Introduction, Second Edition,
John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
[5] Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 8.03SC Physics III: Vibrations and Waves,
Lecture 10, “Traveling Waves,” MIT OpenCourseWare.
[6] Gilbert Strang and Cleve Moler, Learn Differential Equations: Up Close, “Wave
Equation,” MIT OpenCourseWare, 2015.