"The Concept of an unified local field theory and nonlocality of matter."
An unified local field ( non-standard, quantum) theory and nonlocality of matter. Author's abstract quoted verbatim:
"The concept of unified local field theory is considered. According to this concept the quantum description and the classical one must be the
levels for investigation of some world solution of the unified field model.
It is shown that in the framework of the unified local field theory there
are nonlocal correlations between space separate events. Thus the experiments of Aspect type for testing of the Bell inequalities and for showing of the nonlocal correlations do not reject a possibility for description of matter with the unified local field theory. Advantages of such theory for new technologies are considered." ...
"As experimentalists, we think that we establish the initial conditions for the
process under investigation but may be this is too conceitedly and the veritable
initial condition is established earlier. But as theorists, we can already calculate many correlations between the space-time events. Thus we can suppose that the quantum mechanical description is the level for investigation of the world solution. This level takes into consideration, in
particular, the global or nonlocal aspects of this solution.
Nonlocality was founded in quantum mechanics from the outset. In Schroedinger's
picture a free elementary particle (which has a determinate momentum)
is related with a plane wave having a constant amplitude on the whole space. In
this case the quantum mechanical description does not determine a (the) position of the (a) particle. That is, we have the representation of the free elementary particle by non space--localized wave that accentuates just (the) nonlocal aspect of matter.
As we see, there is nonlocality also in the framework of unified local field
theory. But such theory supposes a **soliton model** for a free elementary particle which is intuitively more preferable. Furthermore, according to this concept there is the (a) deterministic description of matter."
===========================References===================
[1] Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N. (1935) Can quantum-mechanical
description of physical reality be considered complete ?, Phys. Rev. 47, 777--
780.
[2] Bohm, D. and Aharonov, Y. (1957) Discussion of experimental proof for
the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky, Phys. Rev. 108, 1070--1076.
[3] Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., and Roger G. (1982) Experimental test od Bell's
inequalities using time--varying analyzers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804--1807.
[4] Bell, J. S. (1964) On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Physics 1,
195--200.
[5] Chernitskii, A.A. (1999) Dyons and interactions in nonlinear (Born-Infeld)
electrodynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 1999, no. 12, Paper 10, 1--34.
[6] Einstein, A. and Tagore, R. (1931) The nature of reality, Modern Review
(Calcutta) XLIX, 42--43.
[7] Chernitskii, A.A. (1998) Nonlinear electrodynamics with singularities
(modernized Born-Infeld electrodynamics), Helv. Phys. Acta 71, 274--287.
[8] Chernitskii, A.A. (1998) Light beams distortion in nonlinear electrodynamics,
J. High Energy Phys. 1998, no. 11, Paper 15, 1--5.
[9] Chernitskii, A.A. (2000) Bidyon or an electromagnetic model for charged
particle with spin, hep-th/0002083.
[10] Chernitskii, A.A. (2002) Born-Infeld electrodynamics: Clifford number and
spinor representations, Int. J. Math. & Math. Sci. 31, 77--84.
[11] Devoret, M.H. and Schoelkopf, R.J. (2000) Amplifying quantum signals
with the single-electron transistor, Nature 406, 1039--1046.
[12] Lloyd, S. (2000) Ultimate physical limits to computation, Nature 406,
1047--1054.
Rights:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0102/0102101v3.pdf
Open
