It's good but need re-arranging
Dear Ben,
Undoubtfully this is a nice example of how one can contribute to PP. But as an encyclopedic entry we don't have to explicitly write down every step in deriving Wien's Law from Planck's Law and numerically computing the Wein constant, in the *main entry*. I suggest in the main article you just tell what the law says and what's its implications in Physics. The detailed steps of calculation and numerical manipulation could be moved to an "attachment" of the defining article.
Thanks
IVE
Undoubtfully this is a nice example of how one can contribute to PP. But as an encyclopedic entry we don't have to explicitly write down every step in deriving Wien's Law from Planck's Law and numerically computing the Wein constant, in the *main entry*. I suggest in the main article you just tell what the law says and what's its implications in Physics. The detailed steps of calculation and numerical manipulation could be moved to an "attachment" of the defining article.
Thanks
IVE