|
|
|
Main Menu
|
|
Sections
Meta
Talkback
Downloads
Information
|
|
|
|
|
![[parent]](https://images.physicslibrary.org/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Correction to 'quantum operator concept'
|
notation by pahio
Correction id: 54
Filed on: 2009-03-12 06:48:59
Status: Accepted on 2009-03-14 00:34:43
Type: Meta/Minor
Correction text:
Hi Ben,
The entry is very clear!
I think one cannot use "grad" for notation of Laplacian -- "grad" means usually the gradient.
As for in the cases you use the \equiv symbol, I think that at least in mathematics the notation := were nowadays more used (when one wants to fix or define some notation).
A little typo: there is "sume" when speaking of sum of operators.
Regards,
Jussi
|
Comment from object owner bloftin:
agree, with grad and changed notation a little, I have also change \equiv to :=, I'll see if it sticks, it reminds me to much of internet smiley faces :=)
Hi Ben,
The entry is very clear!
I think one cannot use "grad" for notation of Laplacian -- "grad" means usually the gradient.
As for in the cases you use the \equiv symbol, I think that at least in mathematics the notation := were nowadays more used (when one wants to fix or define some notation).
A little typo: there is "sume" when speaking of sum of operators.
Regards,
Jussi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
