Viewing Correction to 'quantum operator concept'

notation

Correction id:: 54
Filed on:: 2009-03-12 06:48:59
Status:: Accepted on 2009-03-14 00:34:43
Type:: Meta/Minor

Correction text:

Hi Ben,
The entry is very clear!
I think one cannot use "grad" for notation of Laplacian -- "grad" means usually the gradient.
As for in the cases you use the \equiv symbol, I think that at least in mathematics the notation := were nowadays more used (when one wants to fix or define some notation).
A little typo: there is "sume" when speaking of sum of operators.
Regards,
Jussi

Comment from object owner bloftin:

agree, with grad and changed notation a little, I have also change \equiv to :=, I'll see if it sticks, it reminds me to much of internet smiley faces :=)

Hi Ben,
The entry is very clear!
I think one cannot use "grad" for notation of Laplacian -- "grad" means usually the gradient.
As for in the cases you use the \equiv symbol, I think that at least in mathematics the notation := were nowadays more used (when one wants to fix or define some notation).
A little typo: there is "sume" when speaking of sum of operators.
Regards,
Jussi

Discussion

No messages.